Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The circular addresses the Reduction of Government Litigation by setting monetary limits for filing appeals before GSTAT, High Courts, and Supreme Court. It refers to the National Litigation Policy, emphasizing prudent litigation practices. The circular cites Section 120 of the CGST Act, empowering the Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs to fix monetary limits for appeals. The circular sets monetary limits for filing appeals: GSTAT - 20,00,000/-, High Court - 1,00,00,000/-, and Supreme Court - 2,00,00,000/-. It outlines principles for determining if a case falls within these limits and specifies exclusions where monetary limits do not apply. It highlights that filing an appeal should be based on case merits, not just exceeding monetary limits, to reduce unnecessary litigation. Non-filing of appeals based on monetary limits does not set a precedent value. The circular encourages officers to decide on appeals based on reducing litigation and providing certainty to taxpayers.
The circular addresses the Reduction of Government Litigation by setting monetary limits for filing appeals before GSTAT, High Courts, and Supreme Court. It refers to the National Litigation Policy, emphasizing prudent litigation practices. The circular cites Section 120 of the CGST Act, empowering the Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs to fix monetary limits for appeals. The circular sets monetary limits for filing appeals: GSTAT - 20,00,000/-, High Court - 1,00,00,000/-, and Supreme Court - 2,00,00,000/-. It outlines principles for determining if a case falls within these limits and specifies exclusions where monetary limits do not apply. It highlights that filing an appeal should be based on case merits, not just exceeding monetary limits, to reduce unnecessary litigation. Non-filing of appeals based on monetary limits does not set a precedent value. The circular encourages officers to decide on appeals based on reducing litigation and providing certainty to taxpayers.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
