Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Separate penalty on partner and firm barred for the same contravention; admission supported false declaration penalty but amount was reduced.
    Show cause notice and timely adjudication requirements invalidated customs recovery after a decades-long delay and excess demand.
    Classification of automatic soap dispensers turns on dispersing versus spraying, with Chapter 8424 applying to foam dispensing.
    Mandatory appeal limitation under customs law bars condonation beyond the statutory outer limit and excludes the Limitation Act.
    Provisional release conditions must be proportionate; CESTAT reduced onerous bank guarantees while retaining full-value bonds
    Reduced penalty under Section 114A cannot be extended to Section 112(ii) customs penalties; matter remanded for redetermination.
    Natural justice bars fraud classification based on undisclosed material and a non-speaking order; notice and order quashed.
    Post-petition transfer validation under winding-up law upheld for a bona fide transaction benefiting creditors and lacking fraud.
    Section 244 waiver threshold upheld where prima facie oppression, mismanagement, and articles violations supported the petition.
    Section 7 insolvency cannot be used for coercive recovery where a quadripartite transaction is predominantly contractual.
    Limitation under Section 14 extends to prior IBC proceedings barred by pre-existing dispute, keeping the civil suit timely.
    Limitation under insolvency appeals starts from open-court pronouncement, with no condonation beyond the statutory outer limit.
    Project completion and CoC approval in insolvency: NCLAT rejects one promoter proposal, permits another subject to creditor consent.
    FEMA export proceeds and hearsay evidence defeated the commission-related contravention in independent enforcement proceedings.
    FEMA reporting compliance: timely FC-GPR filing with the authorised dealer defeated the penalty where bank delay caused transmission lapse.
    Corporate guarantee without consideration is not taxable as a supply of service, though the GST valuation challenge failed.
    GST appeal limitation and writ condonation fail where no exceptional circumstances justify delay
    Provisional attachment and parallel proceedings: writ challenge failed for lack of foundational facts and statutory post-decisional remedy.
    Alternative remedy and disputed facts led the High Court to decline writ interference in an input tax credit matter.
    Personal hearing requirement under GST natural justice led to quashing of an ex parte assessment order
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters

The High Court considered the issue of Leave Encashment...

Court Rules on Leave Encashment Limits; No Retrospective Tax Relief for Retirees Exceeding Rs. 3 Lakh Before New Cap.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Income Tax June 27, 2024 Case Laws HC
The High Court considered the issue of Leave Encashment exemption u/s 10AA and the retrospective review of income limit for taxing earned leave salary. The petitioners, retired before the latest notification setting the upper limit at Rs. 25 lakhs, sought relief as their earned leave income exceeded Rs. 3 lakhs. The Court acknowledged the limitation on its power and the separation of powers doctrine, stating it cannot mandate the revision of the upper limit with retrospective effect. While sympathetic, the Court emphasized that such policy decisions fall within the Executive's domain. The writ petitions were disposed of, allowing petitioners to approach the Government for relief, with the Government having the discretion to decide on their representations. Any pending interlocutory applications were dismissed.

Topics

Acts Income Tax