Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Anti-profiteering under GST requires passing on ITC benefit to buyers through price reduction, with interest and penalty exposure.
    Rebuttable anti-profiteering presumption requires consideration of market forces and input costs; report remanded for fresh investigation.
    Bakery goods and restaurant service can be taxed differently from the same premises if supplies and records are kept separate.
    Section 263 revision upheld where non-allocation of Head Office expenses showed lack of inquiry in deduction computation.
    Finality under the Vivad se Vishwas scheme bars rectification of a determined order under the Income-tax Act.
    Penalty for non-compliance with notice was deleted after later compliance was accepted and assessment was completed on the material filed.
    Concessional tax rate under section 115BAA allowed despite delayed Form 10-IC where option was disclosed and processed.
    Section 80P deduction cannot be denied for belated return filing where section 80AC(ii) was not yet applicable.
    Limited risk service provider analysis leads to deletion of transfer pricing adjustment and acceptance of TNMM benchmarking.
    Merger of intimation with scrutiny assessment rendered the appeal infructuous and led to dismissal.
    Transfer pricing rules on comparables, working capital, ESOP parity and receivables interest reshaped by tribunal directions.
    DTAA taxation principles: royalty on receipt basis, software receipts not royalty, and offshore supply profits not taxable in India.
    Fly ash sale proceeds held taxable as business income; separate fund credit was only application of income, not overriding title.
    Transfer pricing on overdue receivables remitted for fresh interest benchmarking, while double additions and credit errors were corrected.
    Consequential penalty orders cannot survive once the underlying quantum assessment is quashed.
    Related-party consultancy charges and vehicle-loan interest were accepted as genuine business expenditure, with disallowances deleted.
    Penalty limitation under section 275(1)(c) ran from AO's initiation recommendation, making the later penalty order time-barred.
    Transfer pricing comparables and receivables interest: KPO exclusion, LIBOR plus 200 basis points, and case-specific credit period applied.
    Limited scrutiny exceeded without approval; partner-funded bank credits were not taxable as firm business income
    Knowledge of concealed goods required for penalty against Customs House Agent under customs law
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters

The High Court considered the issue of Leave Encashment...

Court Rules on Leave Encashment Limits; No Retrospective Tax Relief for Retirees Exceeding Rs. 3 Lakh Before New Cap.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Income Tax June 27, 2024 Case Laws HC
The High Court considered the issue of Leave Encashment exemption u/s 10AA and the retrospective review of income limit for taxing earned leave salary. The petitioners, retired before the latest notification setting the upper limit at Rs. 25 lakhs, sought relief as their earned leave income exceeded Rs. 3 lakhs. The Court acknowledged the limitation on its power and the separation of powers doctrine, stating it cannot mandate the revision of the upper limit with retrospective effect. While sympathetic, the Court emphasized that such policy decisions fall within the Executive's domain. The writ petitions were disposed of, allowing petitioners to approach the Government for relief, with the Government having the discretion to decide on their representations. Any pending interlocutory applications were dismissed.

Topics

Acts Income Tax