Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Me...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, an...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1161 to 1180 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed two main issues. Firstly, regarding the computation of book profit u/s 115JB, discrepancies arose from the deduction claimed by the assessee for brought forward losses or unabsorbed depreciation. The Tribunal directed a fresh verification by the Assessing Officer based on the provided chart. Secondly, concerning TDS u/s 195 for payments to non-residents, the Tribunal held that payments to certain countries were not taxable in India under treaty provisions, thus no tax deduction was required. Additionally, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee regarding disallowance of advances written off, as supported by the Commissioner (Appeals)'s factual findings.
The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed two main issues. Firstly, regarding the computation of book profit u/s 115JB, discrepancies arose from the deduction claimed by the assessee for brought forward losses or unabsorbed depreciation. The Tribunal directed a fresh verification by the Assessing Officer based on the provided chart. Secondly, concerning TDS u/s 195 for payments to non-residents, the Tribunal held that payments to certain countries were not taxable in India under treaty provisions, thus no tax deduction was required. Additionally, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee regarding disallowance of advances written off, as supported by the Commissioner (Appeals)'s factual findings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
