Purposive interpretation of residential house exemption: unregistered purchase agreement alone does not defeat relief, but investment must be verified...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3041 to 3060 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT considered a case involving denial of exemption u/s 10(38) for alleged bogus LTCG. The assessee invested in shares of a company deemed unreliable due to manipulation by brokers for undue benefits. The ITAT emphasized that profit magnitude does not establish the genuineness of an investee company. Despite the assessee's small profit, it was held that the transaction's genuineness cannot be determined solely by profit amount. The ITAT upheld the decision of the CIT (Appeals), dismissing the assessee's appeal based on the lack of error in the earlier order.
The ITAT considered a case involving denial of exemption u/s 10(38) for alleged bogus LTCG. The assessee invested in shares of a company deemed unreliable due to manipulation by brokers for undue benefits. The ITAT emphasized that profit magnitude does not establish the genuineness of an investee company. Despite the assessee's small profit, it was held that the transaction's genuineness cannot be determined solely by profit amount. The ITAT upheld the decision of the CIT (Appeals), dismissing the assessee's appeal based on the lack of error in the earlier order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
