Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
The High Court addressed the issue of whether the Tribunal could uphold the refund granted by the Commissioner, despite setting aside the cost recovery charges demand. The Court held that the appellate-revenue must adhere to the Circular issued by the Central Board of Excise & Customs, which mandates granting refunds arising from adjudication orders without a stay order after three months. The Tribunal relied on this Circular to reject the revenue's appeal against the Commissioner's refund decision. The Court found no merit or substantial legal questions in the appeal and dismissed it.
The High Court addressed the issue of whether the Tribunal could uphold the refund granted by the Commissioner, despite setting aside the cost recovery charges demand. The Court held that the appellate-revenue must adhere to the Circular issued by the Central Board of Excise & Customs, which mandates granting refunds arising from adjudication orders without a stay order after three months. The Tribunal relied on this Circular to reject the revenue's appeal against the Commissioner's refund decision. The Court found no merit or substantial legal questions in the appeal and dismissed it.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
