Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court addressed the issue of whether the Tribunal could uphold the refund granted by the Commissioner, despite setting aside the cost recovery charges demand. The Court held that the appellate-revenue must adhere to the Circular issued by the Central Board of Excise & Customs, which mandates granting refunds arising from adjudication orders without a stay order after three months. The Tribunal relied on this Circular to reject the revenue's appeal against the Commissioner's refund decision. The Court found no merit or substantial legal questions in the appeal and dismissed it.
The High Court addressed the issue of whether the Tribunal could uphold the refund granted by the Commissioner, despite setting aside the cost recovery charges demand. The Court held that the appellate-revenue must adhere to the Circular issued by the Central Board of Excise & Customs, which mandates granting refunds arising from adjudication orders without a stay order after three months. The Tribunal relied on this Circular to reject the revenue's appeal against the Commissioner's refund decision. The Court found no merit or substantial legal questions in the appeal and dismissed it.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.