Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2161 to 2180 of 96140 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The case involved violations of natural justice, service tax Composition Scheme, and valuation issues. The tribunal held that free materials supplied by recipients should not be included in taxable value without investigation. Demand based solely on Form 26AS and returns was deemed impermissible. The extended limitation period was inapplicable as the appellant had a tax record. Pre-amendment Section 73 barred penalty due to non-invoke of extended period. The order was set aside and the appeal allowed.
The case involved violations of natural justice, service tax Composition Scheme, and valuation issues. The tribunal held that free materials supplied by recipients should not be included in taxable value without investigation. Demand based solely on Form 26AS and returns was deemed impermissible. The extended limitation period was inapplicable as the appellant had a tax record. Pre-amendment Section 73 barred penalty due to non-invoke of extended period. The order was set aside and the appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.