Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
The High Court interpreted Section 140(5) of the CGST Act regarding transition of credit. The petitioner sought extension under the proviso to Section 140(5) but was rejected for not filing within the time limit. The section allows credit for duties/taxes on inputs received post the appointed day if recorded within 30 days, extendable by Commissioner for another 30 days on showing sufficient cause. The court held that the rejection based on late filing was incorrect as the provision allows for an extension. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was disposed of.
The High Court interpreted Section 140(5) of the CGST Act regarding transition of credit. The petitioner sought extension under the proviso to Section 140(5) but was rejected for not filing within the time limit. The section allows credit for duties/taxes on inputs received post the appointed day if recorded within 30 days, extendable by Commissioner for another 30 days on showing sufficient cause. The court held that the rejection based on late filing was incorrect as the provision allows for an extension. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
