Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court interpreted Section 140(5) of the CGST Act regarding transition of credit. The petitioner sought extension under the proviso to Section 140(5) but was rejected for not filing within the time limit. The section allows credit for duties/taxes on inputs received post the appointed day if recorded within 30 days, extendable by Commissioner for another 30 days on showing sufficient cause. The court held that the rejection based on late filing was incorrect as the provision allows for an extension. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was disposed of.
The High Court interpreted Section 140(5) of the CGST Act regarding transition of credit. The petitioner sought extension under the proviso to Section 140(5) but was rejected for not filing within the time limit. The section allows credit for duties/taxes on inputs received post the appointed day if recorded within 30 days, extendable by Commissioner for another 30 days on showing sufficient cause. The court held that the rejection based on late filing was incorrect as the provision allows for an extension. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
