Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Page of 4790
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 95794 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court considered the validity of reassessment notices issued u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in light of the Finance Act, 2021. It was held that the reassessment process should have complied with the provisions of the Finance Act, 2021, as per a previous decision. The Court found that the respondent-Department's actions were in contravention of the Finance Act, 2021 and directives from the Supreme Court. Therefore, the notices and subsequent proceedings were deemed illegal and quashed. The consequential orders passed by the respondent Department were also nullified due to the procedural errors in initiating the proceedings. The Court set aside the Show Cause notices and orders, allowing both parties to proceed as per the law.
The High Court considered the validity of reassessment notices issued u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in light of the Finance Act, 2021. It was held that the reassessment process should have complied with the provisions of the Finance Act, 2021, as per a previous decision. The Court found that the respondent-Department's actions were in contravention of the Finance Act, 2021 and directives from the Supreme Court. Therefore, the notices and subsequent proceedings were deemed illegal and quashed. The consequential orders passed by the respondent Department were also nullified due to the procedural errors in initiating the proceedings. The Court set aside the Show Cause notices and orders, allowing both parties to proceed as per the law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.