Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return filing...
Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
461 to 480 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court considered the validity of reassessment notices issued u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in light of the Finance Act, 2021. It was held that the reassessment process should have complied with the provisions of the Finance Act, 2021, as per a previous decision. The Court found that the respondent-Department's actions were in contravention of the Finance Act, 2021 and directives from the Supreme Court. Therefore, the notices and subsequent proceedings were deemed illegal and quashed. The consequential orders passed by the respondent Department were also nullified due to the procedural errors in initiating the proceedings. The Court set aside the Show Cause notices and orders, allowing both parties to proceed as per the law.
The High Court considered the validity of reassessment notices issued u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in light of the Finance Act, 2021. It was held that the reassessment process should have complied with the provisions of the Finance Act, 2021, as per a previous decision. The Court found that the respondent-Department's actions were in contravention of the Finance Act, 2021 and directives from the Supreme Court. Therefore, the notices and subsequent proceedings were deemed illegal and quashed. The consequential orders passed by the respondent Department were also nullified due to the procedural errors in initiating the proceedings. The Court set aside the Show Cause notices and orders, allowing both parties to proceed as per the law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.