Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
The Appellate Tribunal addressed various issues in the case. It directed the AO to delete the disallowance of consequential depreciation on unverified expenses and remit the issue of depreciation on unverified purchases for fresh examination. The Tribunal set aside the disallowance of depreciation on goodwill due to the timing of amalgamation and lack of factual examination. The adjustment on a letter of comfort was deleted as it was not considered a guarantee. An additional ground on deduction u/s 10AA was remitted back to the AO. The Tribunal restored the issue of mark to market loss for further examination. ESOP expenses were allowed, and weighted deduction u/s 35(2AB) upheld. Pre-commencement expenses were allowed as revenue expenditure.
The Appellate Tribunal addressed various issues in the case. It directed the AO to delete the disallowance of consequential depreciation on unverified expenses and remit the issue of depreciation on unverified purchases for fresh examination. The Tribunal set aside the disallowance of depreciation on goodwill due to the timing of amalgamation and lack of factual examination. The adjustment on a letter of comfort was deleted as it was not considered a guarantee. An additional ground on deduction u/s 10AA was remitted back to the AO. The Tribunal restored the issue of mark to market loss for further examination. ESOP expenses were allowed, and weighted deduction u/s 35(2AB) upheld. Pre-commencement expenses were allowed as revenue expenditure.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
