Approved resolution plans extinguish unsubmitted pre-approval tax claims, preventing later recovery outside the insolvency process and preserving a cl...
Transfer pricing comparability requires functional alignment and permits working capital adjustment, while APA margins cannot govern non-covered years...
Treaty benefit, goodwill depreciation and hedging costs: export commission disallowed, while key business deductions and depreciation claims succeeded...
Undisclosed foreign asset classification requires an unexplained source; unrebutted affidavits and corroborative evidence defeated the Black Money Act...
Page of 4789
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
661 to 680 of 95769 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of exemption u/s 11 for income from property held for charitable purposes. It held that the provision of section 11(1)(a) applies, limiting the allowance to 15% of the income from trust property if no application of income is made for charitable purposes. The Tribunal clarified that in the absence of the assessee exercising the option to accumulate income, 85% of the income must be applied for charitable purposes. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's adjustment u/s 143(1)(a) and assessed the income at Rs. 87,430. It also discussed the incorrect application of section 167B for tax rate computation, stating that it should follow normal rates for Associations of Persons. The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal.
The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of exemption u/s 11 for income from property held for charitable purposes. It held that the provision of section 11(1)(a) applies, limiting the allowance to 15% of the income from trust property if no application of income is made for charitable purposes. The Tribunal clarified that in the absence of the assessee exercising the option to accumulate income, 85% of the income must be applied for charitable purposes. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's adjustment u/s 143(1)(a) and assessed the income at Rs. 87,430. It also discussed the incorrect application of section 167B for tax rate computation, stating that it should follow normal rates for Associations of Persons. The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.