Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Me...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, an...
Integrated golf function determines classification, placing launch monitors and simulators under other golf equipment rather than measuring instrument...
Public servant status under anti-corruption law extends to recognised stock exchange leadership; constitutional and sanction challenges do not succeed...
Page of 4790
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
961 to 980 of 95794 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Tribunal dismissed the application seeking to extend the...
The request to extend the Pre-packaged Insolvency Resolution Process for Kethos Tiles Private Limited was denied. Resolution plan not approved within 120 days
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Insolvency and BankruptcyJune 25, 2024Case LawsTri
The Tribunal dismissed the application seeking to extend the Pre-packaged Insolvency Resolution Process (PPIRP) for a Corporate Debtor beyond the specified 120-day period as mandated by Section 54D of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. No Resolution Plan was approved by the Committee of Creditors within the stipulated time frame, leading to the termination of the PPIRP. The Resolution Professional's reliance on Section 12 of the IBC, 2016 was not accepted. The Tribunal found that the Resolution Professional had not fulfilled obligations under the code, leading to the rejection of the application, termination of the PPIRP, and release of the Corporate Debtor from legal proceedings.
The Tribunal dismissed the application seeking to extend the Pre-packaged Insolvency Resolution Process (PPIRP) for a Corporate Debtor beyond the specified 120-day period as mandated by Section 54D of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. No Resolution Plan was approved by the Committee of Creditors within the stipulated time frame, leading to the termination of the PPIRP. The Resolution Professional's reliance on Section 12 of the IBC, 2016 was not accepted. The Tribunal found that the Resolution Professional had not fulfilled obligations under the code, leading to the rejection of the application, termination of the PPIRP, and release of the Corporate Debtor from legal proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4790
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
