Transfer pricing comparability requires functional alignment, reliable financial data, and careful review of working capital and receivables adjustmen...
Transfer pricing rules require benchmarking corporate guarantees and associated-enterprise advances, while invalid domestic-transaction adjustments ca...
Prospective sugar export prohibition required registered letters of credit; private contracts and export quotas created no enforceable continuation ri...
Retroactive interim-moratorium exclusion permits protective asset disclosure and preservation measures against personal guarantors pending arbitration...
Page of 4778
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95557 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Tribunal dismissed the application seeking to extend the...
The request to extend the Pre-packaged Insolvency Resolution Process for Kethos Tiles Private Limited was denied. Resolution plan not approved within 120 days
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Insolvency and BankruptcyJune 25, 2024Case LawsTri
The Tribunal dismissed the application seeking to extend the Pre-packaged Insolvency Resolution Process (PPIRP) for a Corporate Debtor beyond the specified 120-day period as mandated by Section 54D of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. No Resolution Plan was approved by the Committee of Creditors within the stipulated time frame, leading to the termination of the PPIRP. The Resolution Professional's reliance on Section 12 of the IBC, 2016 was not accepted. The Tribunal found that the Resolution Professional had not fulfilled obligations under the code, leading to the rejection of the application, termination of the PPIRP, and release of the Corporate Debtor from legal proceedings.
The Tribunal dismissed the application seeking to extend the Pre-packaged Insolvency Resolution Process (PPIRP) for a Corporate Debtor beyond the specified 120-day period as mandated by Section 54D of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. No Resolution Plan was approved by the Committee of Creditors within the stipulated time frame, leading to the termination of the PPIRP. The Resolution Professional's reliance on Section 12 of the IBC, 2016 was not accepted. The Tribunal found that the Resolution Professional had not fulfilled obligations under the code, leading to the rejection of the application, termination of the PPIRP, and release of the Corporate Debtor from legal proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4778
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
