Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The case involved an appeal dismissed due to the absence of a Board Resolution copy from the authorized signatory filing the appeal. The Appellate Tribunal held that as a private limited company, a Board Resolution was not always required for representation. The Commissioner had not specifically requested the Board Resolution but had asked for other documents, which were submitted by the Appellant. The Tribunal found that the appeal should be remanded back to the Commissioner for a decision on merit, citing relevant legal provisions. The appeal was allowed by way of remand.
The case involved an appeal dismissed due to the absence of a Board Resolution copy from the authorized signatory filing the appeal. The Appellate Tribunal held that as a private limited company, a Board Resolution was not always required for representation. The Commissioner had not specifically requested the Board Resolution but had asked for other documents, which were submitted by the Appellant. The Tribunal found that the appeal should be remanded back to the Commissioner for a decision on merit, citing relevant legal provisions. The appeal was allowed by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
