Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
The case involves a dispute regarding a demand for duty on the consumption of furnace oil by a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU) for generating electricity. The issue was whether the EOU complied with the conditions of Notification No. 22/2003-CE. The Appellate Tribunal held that the EOU had permission to generate power and transfer excess power to the Domestic Tariff Area (DTA) based on Input-Output Norms. As there was no diversion of furnace oil and the demand was solely based on less electricity generation from the oil consumed, the demand was not upheld. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal.
The case involves a dispute regarding a demand for duty on the consumption of furnace oil by a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU) for generating electricity. The issue was whether the EOU complied with the conditions of Notification No. 22/2003-CE. The Appellate Tribunal held that the EOU had permission to generate power and transfer excess power to the Domestic Tariff Area (DTA) based on Input-Output Norms. As there was no diversion of furnace oil and the demand was solely based on less electricity generation from the oil consumed, the demand was not upheld. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
