Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
981 to 1000 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court addressed the power to grant exemptions u/s 8(5)(b) of the CST Act, ruling that it extends beyond "registered dealers" to include other specified categories. This interpretation was supported by previous judgments. The Court also discussed unjust enrichment, stating that refunds are not automatic unless it's proven that tax liability wasn't passed on to consumers. The decision referenced a Supreme Court case emphasizing that the tax component is typically included in the final product cost. Ultimately, the Court upheld the original judgment, dismissing the revision petitions.
The High Court addressed the power to grant exemptions u/s 8(5)(b) of the CST Act, ruling that it extends beyond "registered dealers" to include other specified categories. This interpretation was supported by previous judgments. The Court also discussed unjust enrichment, stating that refunds are not automatic unless it's proven that tax liability wasn't passed on to consumers. The decision referenced a Supreme Court case emphasizing that the tax component is typically included in the final product cost. Ultimately, the Court upheld the original judgment, dismissing the revision petitions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
