Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2741 to 2760 of 96140 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court addressed the power to grant exemptions u/s 8(5)(b) of the CST Act, ruling that it extends beyond "registered dealers" to include other specified categories. This interpretation was supported by previous judgments. The Court also discussed unjust enrichment, stating that refunds are not automatic unless it's proven that tax liability wasn't passed on to consumers. The decision referenced a Supreme Court case emphasizing that the tax component is typically included in the final product cost. Ultimately, the Court upheld the original judgment, dismissing the revision petitions.
The High Court addressed the power to grant exemptions u/s 8(5)(b) of the CST Act, ruling that it extends beyond "registered dealers" to include other specified categories. This interpretation was supported by previous judgments. The Court also discussed unjust enrichment, stating that refunds are not automatic unless it's proven that tax liability wasn't passed on to consumers. The decision referenced a Supreme Court case emphasizing that the tax component is typically included in the final product cost. Ultimately, the Court upheld the original judgment, dismissing the revision petitions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
