Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
The High Court quashed an impugned order due to an excess tax demand compared to the amount in the show cause notice under Sub-Section (7) of Section 75 of Uttarakhand Goods and Services Act, 2017. The State acknowledged the order did not align with the Act as the demand exceeded the notice amount. The court allowed the petition, leading to the order's annulment on 06.11.2023.
The High Court quashed an impugned order due to an excess tax demand compared to the amount in the show cause notice under Sub-Section (7) of Section 75 of Uttarakhand Goods and Services Act, 2017. The State acknowledged the order did not align with the Act as the demand exceeded the notice amount. The court allowed the petition, leading to the order's annulment on 06.11.2023.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
