Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Merchant banker regulation consolidates registration, governance, capital, reporting, outsourcing and investor-protection requirements under an update...
The High Court quashed an impugned order due to an excess tax demand compared to the amount in the show cause notice under Sub-Section (7) of Section 75 of Uttarakhand Goods and Services Act, 2017. The State acknowledged the order did not align with the Act as the demand exceeded the notice amount. The court allowed the petition, leading to the order's annulment on 06.11.2023.
The High Court quashed an impugned order due to an excess tax demand compared to the amount in the show cause notice under Sub-Section (7) of Section 75 of Uttarakhand Goods and Services Act, 2017. The State acknowledged the order did not align with the Act as the demand exceeded the notice amount. The court allowed the petition, leading to the order's annulment on 06.11.2023.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
