Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed several key issues in...
Tax credit granted for Tega Industries restored for verification. Corporate guarantee with AE = international transaction. Corporate guarantee fee set at 0.5%.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed several key issues in the case. Firstly, a short grant of advance tax credit was challenged, leading to a decision to send the matter back to the ld. AO for verification. Secondly, a TP adjustment related to a corporate guarantee was deemed an international transaction under Section 92B. This decision was supported by a relevant court judgment. Finally, the calculation of the corporate guarantee fee was discussed, with a range of 0.2% to 0.5% considered justified based on precedent. The TPO was directed to compute the fee at 0.5% and delete any excess amount added to the assessee's income. Overall, the Tribunal partly allowed the assessee's grounds on these matters.
The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed several key issues in the case. Firstly, a short grant of advance tax credit was challenged, leading to a decision to send the matter back to the ld. AO for verification. Secondly, a TP adjustment related to a corporate guarantee was deemed an international transaction under Section 92B. This decision was supported by a relevant court judgment. Finally, the calculation of the corporate guarantee fee was discussed, with a range of 0.2% to 0.5% considered justified based on precedent. The TPO was directed to compute the fee at 0.5% and delete any excess amount added to the assessee's income. Overall, the Tribunal partly allowed the assessee's grounds on these matters.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.