Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
461 to 480 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Appellate Tribunal reviewed an ex parte order by the CIT(A)...
Additions u/s 69 and 69A, with tax u/s 115BBE: Ex part order challenged due to CIT(A) not considering assessee's grounds. Appeal set aside for fresh hearing.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The Appellate Tribunal reviewed an ex parte order by the CIT(A) concerning the addition of unexplained income under sections 69 and 69A, with tax levied under section 115BBE. The AR argued that despite multiple hearing dates being allocated, the order was passed without considering the assessee's grounds, including issues with notice receipt and adjournment petitions. The Tribunal found the order lacking in both merit and legal grounds, directing a fresh consideration by the CIT(A) to ensure justice and a fair hearing for the assessee. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing the importance of due process.
The Appellate Tribunal reviewed an ex parte order by the CIT(A) concerning the addition of unexplained income under sections 69 and 69A, with tax levied under section 115BBE. The AR argued that despite multiple hearing dates being allocated, the order was passed without considering the assessee's grounds, including issues with notice receipt and adjournment petitions. The Tribunal found the order lacking in both merit and legal grounds, directing a fresh consideration by the CIT(A) to ensure justice and a fair hearing for the assessee. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing the importance of due process.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.