Transfer pricing comparables and adjustments: Tribunal revisits loss-maker status, segmental comparability, working capital relief, and risk allocatio...
Business expenditure disallowance failed where commission, related-party salary and promotion payments were supported by records and inquiry was inade...
The ITAT considered the delay in filing the appeal of 233 days due to the CA's gross negligence. The CA failed to inform the Society about orders, resulting in a huge outstanding demand. The Society, unaware of orders, only acted after bank accounts were attached. The CA neglected to file appeals timely, causing further issues. The ITAT found the Society not at fault, granting relief for the counsel's negligence. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes to address the injustice suffered by the assessee.
The ITAT considered the delay in filing the appeal of 233 days due to the CA's gross negligence. The CA failed to inform the Society about orders, resulting in a huge outstanding demand. The Society, unaware of orders, only acted after bank accounts were attached. The CA neglected to file appeals timely, causing further issues. The ITAT found the Society not at fault, granting relief for the counsel's negligence. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes to address the injustice suffered by the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.