Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed the issue of denying exemption from duty on the import of specific goods due to a realignment of tariff headings. The Tribunal found that the goods were cleared without the benefit of the Notification due to incorrect tariff entry. The Commissioner's decision to deny the benefit based on the Corrigendum being prospective was deemed erroneous. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner's order and granting the benefit of the amended Notification.
CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed the issue of denying exemption from duty on the import of specific goods due to a realignment of tariff headings. The Tribunal found that the goods were cleared without the benefit of the Notification due to incorrect tariff entry. The Commissioner's decision to deny the benefit based on the Corrigendum being prospective was deemed erroneous. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner's order and granting the benefit of the amended Notification.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
