Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court addressed the jurisdictional conflict between Civil Court and NCLT/NCLAT in a dispute over share transfer/title. The plaint was rejected based on SPA's Clause 8, citing Companies Act, 2013. Court held SPA mandated arbitration but didn't exclude Civil Court jurisdiction. The objection on Arbitration Act's Section 11 appointment was premature. Companies Act sections don't bar the Civil Court from hearing share disputes. NCLT isn't suitable for individual share disputes. The order rejecting the plaint was overturned as Companies Act sections didn't apply.
The High Court addressed the jurisdictional conflict between Civil Court and NCLT/NCLAT in a dispute over share transfer/title. The plaint was rejected based on SPA's Clause 8, citing Companies Act, 2013. Court held SPA mandated arbitration but didn't exclude Civil Court jurisdiction. The objection on Arbitration Act's Section 11 appointment was premature. Companies Act sections don't bar the Civil Court from hearing share disputes. NCLT isn't suitable for individual share disputes. The order rejecting the plaint was overturned as Companies Act sections didn't apply.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
