Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
The NCLAT, an Appellate Tribunal, rejected an application regarding Auction Sale by a Liquidator in a Company Appeal. The Appellant, an Erstwhile Director/Shareholder of the Corporate Debtor, questioned the Sale Certificate and Sale made by the Liquidator. The Tribunal noted the finality of the Order of Liquidation and the Appellant's status as an Ex-Director/Shareholder. The Appellant's delay in questioning the sale precluded him from reopening the proceedings. The Interlocutory Application was deemed not grounds to revisit the Auction Sale. The appeal was dismissed, and the Impugned Order was affirmed.
The NCLAT, an Appellate Tribunal, rejected an application regarding Auction Sale by a Liquidator in a Company Appeal. The Appellant, an Erstwhile Director/Shareholder of the Corporate Debtor, questioned the Sale Certificate and Sale made by the Liquidator. The Tribunal noted the finality of the Order of Liquidation and the Appellant's status as an Ex-Director/Shareholder. The Appellant's delay in questioning the sale precluded him from reopening the proceedings. The Interlocutory Application was deemed not grounds to revisit the Auction Sale. The appeal was dismissed, and the Impugned Order was affirmed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.