Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
The NCLAT, an Appellate Tribunal, rejected an application regarding Auction Sale by a Liquidator in a Company Appeal. The Appellant, an Erstwhile Director/Shareholder of the Corporate Debtor, questioned the Sale Certificate and Sale made by the Liquidator. The Tribunal noted the finality of the Order of Liquidation and the Appellant's status as an Ex-Director/Shareholder. The Appellant's delay in questioning the sale precluded him from reopening the proceedings. The Interlocutory Application was deemed not grounds to revisit the Auction Sale. The appeal was dismissed, and the Impugned Order was affirmed.
The NCLAT, an Appellate Tribunal, rejected an application regarding Auction Sale by a Liquidator in a Company Appeal. The Appellant, an Erstwhile Director/Shareholder of the Corporate Debtor, questioned the Sale Certificate and Sale made by the Liquidator. The Tribunal noted the finality of the Order of Liquidation and the Appellant's status as an Ex-Director/Shareholder. The Appellant's delay in questioning the sale precluded him from reopening the proceedings. The Interlocutory Application was deemed not grounds to revisit the Auction Sale. The appeal was dismissed, and the Impugned Order was affirmed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.