Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Page of 4788
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
421 to 440 of 95749 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The NCLAT, an Appellate Tribunal, rejected an application regarding Auction Sale by a Liquidator in a Company Appeal. The Appellant, an Erstwhile Director/Shareholder of the Corporate Debtor, questioned the Sale Certificate and Sale made by the Liquidator. The Tribunal noted the finality of the Order of Liquidation and the Appellant's status as an Ex-Director/Shareholder. The Appellant's delay in questioning the sale precluded him from reopening the proceedings. The Interlocutory Application was deemed not grounds to revisit the Auction Sale. The appeal was dismissed, and the Impugned Order was affirmed.
The NCLAT, an Appellate Tribunal, rejected an application regarding Auction Sale by a Liquidator in a Company Appeal. The Appellant, an Erstwhile Director/Shareholder of the Corporate Debtor, questioned the Sale Certificate and Sale made by the Liquidator. The Tribunal noted the finality of the Order of Liquidation and the Appellant's status as an Ex-Director/Shareholder. The Appellant's delay in questioning the sale precluded him from reopening the proceedings. The Interlocutory Application was deemed not grounds to revisit the Auction Sale. The appeal was dismissed, and the Impugned Order was affirmed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
