Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
The High Court considered the maintainability of a petition challenging the cancellation of GST registration. Petitioner argued violation of natural justice and constitutional rights. Referring to WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION case, the court noted exceptions to the availability of alternative remedy. Show cause notice contained necessary details, rejecting petitioner's claim of violation of natural justice. While acknowledging alternative remedies, the court allowed the petitioner to challenge the order within a reasonable time. The writ petition was dismissed, granting the petitioner a chance to appeal u/s 30 of the GST Act.
The High Court considered the maintainability of a petition challenging the cancellation of GST registration. Petitioner argued violation of natural justice and constitutional rights. Referring to WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION case, the court noted exceptions to the availability of alternative remedy. Show cause notice contained necessary details, rejecting petitioner's claim of violation of natural justice. While acknowledging alternative remedies, the court allowed the petitioner to challenge the order within a reasonable time. The writ petition was dismissed, granting the petitioner a chance to appeal u/s 30 of the GST Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.