Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court found a violation of natural justice as the petitioner was not given a fair opportunity to contest a tax demand. The tax proposal was upheld due to the petitioner's failure to submit written objections or attend a hearing. The court acknowledged the petitioner's claim of being unaware of the proceedings. To rectify this, the court set aside the orders and remanded the matters for reconsideration, with the condition that the petitioner pays 10% of the disputed tax demand for each assessment period within 15 days. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
The High Court found a violation of natural justice as the petitioner was not given a fair opportunity to contest a tax demand. The tax proposal was upheld due to the petitioner's failure to submit written objections or attend a hearing. The court acknowledged the petitioner's claim of being unaware of the proceedings. To rectify this, the court set aside the orders and remanded the matters for reconsideration, with the condition that the petitioner pays 10% of the disputed tax demand for each assessment period within 15 days. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.