Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
The Advance Ruling Authority (AAR) considered an application regarding the levy of GST under reverse charge mechanism on royalty payments. The AAR cited u/s 98(2) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, which prohibits admitting applications where the question raised is already pending or decided in the applicant's proceedings under the Act. In this case, the AAR found that the applicant's issue on GST payment had already been raised in their own proceedings under the Act. Therefore, the AAR rejected the application without delving into the merits of the case. Application was rejected.
The Advance Ruling Authority (AAR) considered an application regarding the levy of GST under reverse charge mechanism on royalty payments. The AAR cited u/s 98(2) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, which prohibits admitting applications where the question raised is already pending or decided in the applicant's proceedings under the Act. In this case, the AAR found that the applicant's issue on GST payment had already been raised in their own proceedings under the Act. Therefore, the AAR rejected the application without delving into the merits of the case. Application was rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4780
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
