Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
The Advance Ruling Authority (AAR) considered an application regarding the levy of GST under reverse charge mechanism on royalty payments. The AAR cited u/s 98(2) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, which prohibits admitting applications where the question raised is already pending or decided in the applicant's proceedings under the Act. In this case, the AAR found that the applicant's issue on GST payment had already been raised in their own proceedings under the Act. Therefore, the AAR rejected the application without delving into the merits of the case. Application was rejected.
The Advance Ruling Authority (AAR) considered an application regarding the levy of GST under reverse charge mechanism on royalty payments. The AAR cited u/s 98(2) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, which prohibits admitting applications where the question raised is already pending or decided in the applicant's proceedings under the Act. In this case, the AAR found that the applicant's issue on GST payment had already been raised in their own proceedings under the Act. Therefore, the AAR rejected the application without delving into the merits of the case. Application was rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
