Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT dealt with a case involving a Revision u/s 263. The PCIT alleged that the AO did not inquire into cash deposits during demonetization or non-disclosure of income from scrap sales. However, the ITAT found that the AO had conducted proper inquiries based on assessment records, notices issued u/s 142(1), and replies from the assessee. The PCIT's allegations were deemed unfounded as the assessment order was not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue. The ITAT emphasized that invoking section 263 requires meeting specific conditions and that the revisionary authority cannot act arbitrarily. The decision favored the assessee due to lack of evidence supporting the PCIT's allegations.
The ITAT dealt with a case involving a Revision u/s 263. The PCIT alleged that the AO did not inquire into cash deposits during demonetization or non-disclosure of income from scrap sales. However, the ITAT found that the AO had conducted proper inquiries based on assessment records, notices issued u/s 142(1), and replies from the assessee. The PCIT's allegations were deemed unfounded as the assessment order was not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue. The ITAT emphasized that invoking section 263 requires meeting specific conditions and that the revisionary authority cannot act arbitrarily. The decision favored the assessee due to lack of evidence supporting the PCIT's allegations.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
