Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
The ITAT dealt with a case involving a Revision u/s 263. The PCIT alleged that the AO did not inquire into cash deposits during demonetization or non-disclosure of income from scrap sales. However, the ITAT found that the AO had conducted proper inquiries based on assessment records, notices issued u/s 142(1), and replies from the assessee. The PCIT's allegations were deemed unfounded as the assessment order was not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue. The ITAT emphasized that invoking section 263 requires meeting specific conditions and that the revisionary authority cannot act arbitrarily. The decision favored the assessee due to lack of evidence supporting the PCIT's allegations.
The ITAT dealt with a case involving a Revision u/s 263. The PCIT alleged that the AO did not inquire into cash deposits during demonetization or non-disclosure of income from scrap sales. However, the ITAT found that the AO had conducted proper inquiries based on assessment records, notices issued u/s 142(1), and replies from the assessee. The PCIT's allegations were deemed unfounded as the assessment order was not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue. The ITAT emphasized that invoking section 263 requires meeting specific conditions and that the revisionary authority cannot act arbitrarily. The decision favored the assessee due to lack of evidence supporting the PCIT's allegations.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
