Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
The ITAT held that the rejection of final Registration u/s. 80G(5)(iii) due to a belated filing was justified. The Trust had failed to file within the six-month period, rendering the application not maintainable. The decision overlooked Circular No. 6 of 2023, allowing fresh applications until 30-09-2023. The ITAT directed the CIT[E] to reconsider the application for final Registration u/s. 80G, ensuring the Trust's cooperation in providing necessary details. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.
The ITAT held that the rejection of final Registration u/s. 80G(5)(iii) due to a belated filing was justified. The Trust had failed to file within the six-month period, rendering the application not maintainable. The decision overlooked Circular No. 6 of 2023, allowing fresh applications until 30-09-2023. The ITAT directed the CIT[E] to reconsider the application for final Registration u/s. 80G, ensuring the Trust's cooperation in providing necessary details. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.