Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Page of 4778
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
81 to 100 of 95557 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT held that exemption u/s 10(23C) was disallowed due to non-filing of audit report in Form 10BB. Assessee not registered u/s 10(23), ineligible for exemption. Net income to be taxed after allowable expenditure deduction. Remanded to AO to tax net income after deducting expenses like regular, salary, puja, and admissible expenditure. CIT (A) erred in not addressing eligibility issue. Assessee to be assessed as AOP. Issue of eligibility to claim u/s 10(23) to be reconsidered by CIT (A) with opportunity for assessee to present evidence. Remanded for fresh adjudication.
The ITAT held that exemption u/s 10(23C) was disallowed due to non-filing of audit report in Form 10BB. Assessee not registered u/s 10(23), ineligible for exemption. Net income to be taxed after allowable expenditure deduction. Remanded to AO to tax net income after deducting expenses like regular, salary, puja, and admissible expenditure. CIT (A) erred in not addressing eligibility issue. Assessee to be assessed as AOP. Issue of eligibility to claim u/s 10(23) to be reconsidered by CIT (A) with opportunity for assessee to present evidence. Remanded for fresh adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.