Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Page of 4782
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
301 to 320 of 95636 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT held that exemption u/s 10(23C) was disallowed due to non-filing of audit report in Form 10BB. Assessee not registered u/s 10(23), ineligible for exemption. Net income to be taxed after allowable expenditure deduction. Remanded to AO to tax net income after deducting expenses like regular, salary, puja, and admissible expenditure. CIT (A) erred in not addressing eligibility issue. Assessee to be assessed as AOP. Issue of eligibility to claim u/s 10(23) to be reconsidered by CIT (A) with opportunity for assessee to present evidence. Remanded for fresh adjudication.
The ITAT held that exemption u/s 10(23C) was disallowed due to non-filing of audit report in Form 10BB. Assessee not registered u/s 10(23), ineligible for exemption. Net income to be taxed after allowable expenditure deduction. Remanded to AO to tax net income after deducting expenses like regular, salary, puja, and admissible expenditure. CIT (A) erred in not addressing eligibility issue. Assessee to be assessed as AOP. Issue of eligibility to claim u/s 10(23) to be reconsidered by CIT (A) with opportunity for assessee to present evidence. Remanded for fresh adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.