Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The ITAT held that an ex-parte appellate order by the CIT(A) without providing a reasonable opportunity violated natural justice. The assessee company had requested an adjournment on the first hearing date, and the notice for the subsequent hearing was received late. The CIT(A) wrongly stated the company failed to comply. The order was deemed a violation of basic principles of natural justice. The matter was remanded to the CIT(A) for re-adjudication after providing a fair hearing to the assessee. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.
The ITAT held that an ex-parte appellate order by the CIT(A) without providing a reasonable opportunity violated natural justice. The assessee company had requested an adjournment on the first hearing date, and the notice for the subsequent hearing was received late. The CIT(A) wrongly stated the company failed to comply. The order was deemed a violation of basic principles of natural justice. The matter was remanded to the CIT(A) for re-adjudication after providing a fair hearing to the assessee. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4780
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
