Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
The ITAT Gauhati Bench jurisdiction issue was raised concerning an appeal filed under improper jurisdiction. The assessee's address was consistently in Kolkata, with no formal transfer to Gauhati jurisdiction. Referring to legal precedents, the appeal was deemed under improper jurisdiction due to the assessment order's origin in Kolkata. The appeal was dismissed, allowing the Revenue to refile before the appropriate ITAT bench with a delay condonation petition. The time taken for the dismissed appeal may be considered for delay condonation in the refiled appeal.
The ITAT Gauhati Bench jurisdiction issue was raised concerning an appeal filed under improper jurisdiction. The assessee's address was consistently in Kolkata, with no formal transfer to Gauhati jurisdiction. Referring to legal precedents, the appeal was deemed under improper jurisdiction due to the assessment order's origin in Kolkata. The appeal was dismissed, allowing the Revenue to refile before the appropriate ITAT bench with a delay condonation petition. The time taken for the dismissed appeal may be considered for delay condonation in the refiled appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.