Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT Gauhati Bench jurisdiction issue was raised concerning an appeal filed under improper jurisdiction. The assessee's address was consistently in Kolkata, with no formal transfer to Gauhati jurisdiction. Referring to legal precedents, the appeal was deemed under improper jurisdiction due to the assessment order's origin in Kolkata. The appeal was dismissed, allowing the Revenue to refile before the appropriate ITAT bench with a delay condonation petition. The time taken for the dismissed appeal may be considered for delay condonation in the refiled appeal.
The ITAT Gauhati Bench jurisdiction issue was raised concerning an appeal filed under improper jurisdiction. The assessee's address was consistently in Kolkata, with no formal transfer to Gauhati jurisdiction. Referring to legal precedents, the appeal was deemed under improper jurisdiction due to the assessment order's origin in Kolkata. The appeal was dismissed, allowing the Revenue to refile before the appropriate ITAT bench with a delay condonation petition. The time taken for the dismissed appeal may be considered for delay condonation in the refiled appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.