Prospective valuation amendment limits reassessment: unamended fair market value reference could not justify reopening based on a registered valuer's ...
Exemption for examination-related services rejected where recipients were commercial entities; suppression sustained extended limitation and penalties...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1281 to 1300 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Appellate Tribunal considered the applicability of u/s 50C regarding capital gain computation for the transfer of leasehold rights. It was held that u/s 50C applies only to land or building, not lease rights. Citing precedents, it was noted that u/s 50C does not cover leasehold rights. The deeming provision of u/s 50C substitutes stamp valuation authority's value if lower than consideration received. As leasehold rights are not covered, u/s 50C does not apply. The AO can compute capital gains without invoking u/s 50C.
The Appellate Tribunal considered the applicability of u/s 50C regarding capital gain computation for the transfer of leasehold rights. It was held that u/s 50C applies only to land or building, not lease rights. Citing precedents, it was noted that u/s 50C does not cover leasehold rights. The deeming provision of u/s 50C substitutes stamp valuation authority's value if lower than consideration received. As leasehold rights are not covered, u/s 50C does not apply. The AO can compute capital gains without invoking u/s 50C.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.