Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3221 to 3240 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Appellate Tribunal addressed the disallowance of benefit u/s 90/90A for foreign tax paid in Bhutan due to Form No. 67 not filed within time frame. Relying on legal precedents, including Duraiswamy Kumaraswamy, it held that failure to file Form No. 67 timely does not bar claiming foreign tax credit. The assessee's claim was allowed as Form No. 67 was filed with the return u/s 139(4). The Assessing Officer was directed to grant foreign tax credit as per law and India-Bhutan DTAA u/s 90. The appeal of the assessee was upheld.
The Appellate Tribunal addressed the disallowance of benefit u/s 90/90A for foreign tax paid in Bhutan due to Form No. 67 not filed within time frame. Relying on legal precedents, including Duraiswamy Kumaraswamy, it held that failure to file Form No. 67 timely does not bar claiming foreign tax credit. The assessee's claim was allowed as Form No. 67 was filed with the return u/s 139(4). The Assessing Officer was directed to grant foreign tax credit as per law and India-Bhutan DTAA u/s 90. The appeal of the assessee was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
