Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed the issue of determining income from futures transactions. The Tribunal held that the AO's addition lacked transparency as no information on the alleged transaction was shared. The CIT(A) accepted the turnover disclosed by the assessee but unreasonably applied a 50% profit rate. Given the acceptance of turnover and the assessee's choice of presumptive taxation u/s 44AD, the statutory 8% profit rate should apply. Consequently, the assessee's appeal was allowed.
The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed the issue of determining income from futures transactions. The Tribunal held that the AO's addition lacked transparency as no information on the alleged transaction was shared. The CIT(A) accepted the turnover disclosed by the assessee but unreasonably applied a 50% profit rate. Given the acceptance of turnover and the assessee's choice of presumptive taxation u/s 44AD, the statutory 8% profit rate should apply. Consequently, the assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
