Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2741 to 2760 of 96140 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Appellate Tribunal considered Transfer Pricing adjustment u/s 92 for inter-unit power transfer. TPO rejected TP report, comparing sale prices with GEB. Tribunal favored assessee, citing GEB's price as correct comparison u/s 80-IA(8). TPL not valid for CUP. Admitted additional ground on deduction u/s 80-IA for steam transfer at market value. Assessee's reasonable cause accepted. Matter remitted to AO for fresh assessment on market value of steam for 80-IA deduction. Relevant legal principles u/s 80-IA and admission of additional grounds were considered in line with Supreme Court decisions.
The Appellate Tribunal considered Transfer Pricing adjustment u/s 92 for inter-unit power transfer. TPO rejected TP report, comparing sale prices with GEB. Tribunal favored assessee, citing GEB's price as correct comparison u/s 80-IA(8). TPL not valid for CUP. Admitted additional ground on deduction u/s 80-IA for steam transfer at market value. Assessee's reasonable cause accepted. Matter remitted to AO for fresh assessment on market value of steam for 80-IA deduction. Relevant legal principles u/s 80-IA and admission of additional grounds were considered in line with Supreme Court decisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.