Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3301 to 3320 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed the issue of TDS u/s 194A. The case involved delay interest charged by a broker, treated as finance cost, without TDS deduction. ITAT held that interest paid for delayed payments, not on borrowed capital, isn't covered u/s 2(28A). Citing a similar case, ITAT directed AO to delete the addition, allowing the assessee's appeal. The decision clarified that Section 194A applies to interest on borrowed capital, not on delayed purchase payments.
The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed the issue of TDS u/s 194A. The case involved delay interest charged by a broker, treated as finance cost, without TDS deduction. ITAT held that interest paid for delayed payments, not on borrowed capital, isn't covered u/s 2(28A). Citing a similar case, ITAT directed AO to delete the addition, allowing the assessee's appeal. The decision clarified that Section 194A applies to interest on borrowed capital, not on delayed purchase payments.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4813 
Join Channel 
