Habeas corpus challenge to arrest safeguards remains maintainable, but substantial compliance with reasons-to-believe requirement defeats the petition...
The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed the issue of TDS u/s 194A. The case involved delay interest charged by a broker, treated as finance cost, without TDS deduction. ITAT held that interest paid for delayed payments, not on borrowed capital, isn't covered u/s 2(28A). Citing a similar case, ITAT directed AO to delete the addition, allowing the assessee's appeal. The decision clarified that Section 194A applies to interest on borrowed capital, not on delayed purchase payments.
The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed the issue of TDS u/s 194A. The case involved delay interest charged by a broker, treated as finance cost, without TDS deduction. ITAT held that interest paid for delayed payments, not on borrowed capital, isn't covered u/s 2(28A). Citing a similar case, ITAT directed AO to delete the addition, allowing the assessee's appeal. The decision clarified that Section 194A applies to interest on borrowed capital, not on delayed purchase payments.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
