Purposive interpretation of residential house exemption: unregistered purchase agreement alone does not defeat relief, but investment must be verified...
The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed the issue of TDS u/s 194A. The case involved delay interest charged by a broker, treated as finance cost, without TDS deduction. ITAT held that interest paid for delayed payments, not on borrowed capital, isn't covered u/s 2(28A). Citing a similar case, ITAT directed AO to delete the addition, allowing the assessee's appeal. The decision clarified that Section 194A applies to interest on borrowed capital, not on delayed purchase payments.
The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed the issue of TDS u/s 194A. The case involved delay interest charged by a broker, treated as finance cost, without TDS deduction. ITAT held that interest paid for delayed payments, not on borrowed capital, isn't covered u/s 2(28A). Citing a similar case, ITAT directed AO to delete the addition, allowing the assessee's appeal. The decision clarified that Section 194A applies to interest on borrowed capital, not on delayed purchase payments.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
