Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The High Court ruled on the cancellation of GST registration due to non-functional business premises. The court found violations of Rule 25 of CGST Rules as physical verification was not done in the presence of concerned persons. The State Tax Officer had admitted the existence of the petitioner's unit prior to issuing a show cause notice for cancellation. The petitioner had informed about changing the principal place of business, which was acknowledged. The court directed restoration of GST registration retroactively from 20.09.2022, allowing filing of annual returns with late fees. Petition disposed off.
The High Court ruled on the cancellation of GST registration due to non-functional business premises. The court found violations of Rule 25 of CGST Rules as physical verification was not done in the presence of concerned persons. The State Tax Officer had admitted the existence of the petitioner's unit prior to issuing a show cause notice for cancellation. The petitioner had informed about changing the principal place of business, which was acknowledged. The court directed restoration of GST registration retroactively from 20.09.2022, allowing filing of annual returns with late fees. Petition disposed off.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
